Skip to main content

ConvertAll - Conversia unei liste mult mai usor

Avem urmatorul scenariu. O lista de elemente de tip A, pe care trebuie sa o convertim la o lista de tip B. Pentru a putea rezolva aceasta problema putem să implementam operatorul implicit sau explicit de conversie, iar apoi să iteram prin lista pentru a face conversia la tipul B.
List<A> listaA;
List<B> listaB;
...
foreach(A a in listaA)
{
listaB.Add(a);
}

sau
listaB.foreach(item=>listaB.Add(item));
Ambele soluții sunt rezonabile, dar e puțin mai greu de înțeles ca in spate se face o conversie. Pentru a face codul mai clar putem să facem in felul următor:
listaB = listaA.ConvertAll<B>(item => item)
Ce am scris mai sus? Fiecare element din listaA convertestel in tipul B si adaug-al in colecția care rezulta. item => item am putut sa scrie deoarece am presupus ca un operator de conversie implicita sau explicita intre cele doua tipuri a fost deja implementat.
In cazul in care acesta nu ar fi implementat am avea ceva asemanator:
Din
private B ConvertAToB(A a) { return new B(); ... }
...
List<A> listaA;
List<B> listaB;
...
foreach(A a in listaA)
{
listaB.Add(ConvertAToB(a));
}
Am avea:
private B ConvertAToB(A a) { return new B(); ... }
...
listaB = listaA.ConvertAll<B>(item => ConvertAToB(item));
Cea ce am scris mai sus se poate scrie si:
listaB = listaA.ConvertAll<B>(ConvertAToB);
Chiar daca folosim ConvertAll obtinem acelasi rezultat, doar ca folosind ConvertAll obtinem un cod mai clar. Urmatorul dezvoltator care o sa vina dupa noi o sa inteleaga ca aici facem oconversie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP