Skip to main content

Manage bearer token when we scale on more than one server - OWIN, Katana, AngularJS

In this post we will talk about bearer token authentication and how we should manage this token when our application is running on more than one server -  when we are using OWIN, Katana and AngularJS.

Token Characteristics
First of all let’s see what are the characteristics of bearer token:
  • Generate by server
  • Contains user claims (what kind of operations a user can do/roles)
  • All information that a token contains are encrypted
  • Token information can be decrypted only by the machine that created the token
  • Expiration date is encrypted in the token itself
  • No token information are stored on the server side
  • Encryption is safe enough to be used worldwide (Facebook, Google and Twitter are using it) 
  • A token can be used by external system only when decryption key is shared
  • Easy and cheap to generate tokens
Why?
All this sounds good, but what is happening if we want to go in production. In this case we should be able to scale our backend from one node to 3 or 10 nodes.
Do we need stick connection?... to be able to redirect all the request from the same client to the same instance (because token can be decrypted only by the machine that generate the key)
NO, we don’t need this.

How?
To be able to allow other instances or servers to decrypt and access token information we need to set the machine key. This can be configured directly in the web.config. Once this configuration is done all the encryption/decryption by that application will be use them.

In the system.web section of our configuration file we need to specify the machine key node. We need to specify the validation key, decryption key and what kind of validation and decryption mechanism we want to use.
  <system.web>
    <compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
    <httpRuntime targetFramework="4.5" />
    <machineKey validationKey="BDE5239FBD71982481D87D815FA0A65B9F5982D99DFA96E6D92B782E0952D58818B479B19FF6D95263E85B0209297E6858B57D1E0BD3EFECE5E35742D605F2A7"
              decryptionKey="8E8496D7342EA258526CF6177E04EA7D208E359C95E60CD2A462FC062B9E41B3"
              validation="SHA1"
              decryption="AES"/>
  </system.web>
Be aware, don’t use this keys, you should generate your own keys, otherwise "I" will be able to decrypt your token also.
For ISS, the machine key and validation key can be generated easily using ISS features (https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755177(v=ws.10).aspx) or we can use PowerShell (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2915218#AppendixA)

Conclusion
In conclusion we saw that it is not complicated to 'connect’ multiple application instances to use and access the same token but we need to be able to share the machine key between them.
Another option is to have a dedicate machine that manage and validate token, but this is another story.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP