Skip to main content

Azure Load Balancer and Sticky Connection (Source IP Affinity)

In this post we will talk about Azure Load Balancer and how we can have stick connection to our Azure Resources when we have multiple instances.

Background
When we are using Azure VMs, Web Roles or Worker Roles and having multiple instances of the same type, all our requests will fly through a Azure Load Balancer. By default, Azure Load Balancer is not offering sticky sessions based on Source IP and Destination IP (see the last part of blog post).
This means that multiple requests that are coming from the same client are not guaranteed to end up to the same instance when port is changing. Based on different counters, like CPU level for example, Azure Load Balancer can decide to redirect a request to another instance.
There are cases when we need sticky connection and all the requests to end up to the same instance on Azure side. A good example is a relay server, where ports are changing for each request. In this case we need to be sure that all requests from the same source end up on the same instance.
Another example is for cases when we have a web application and we want all the requests from the same client to end up on the same instance, even when the requests are made using different ports (80, 8080, 443, ...)

In the above example we can observe that two different request from the same client, where the source port is different can end up on different instances.

Azure Solution
Azure Load Balancer supports this features, offering us the possibility to have sticky connections. This custom configuration of Azure Load Balancer is called Source IP. It allow us to bind a client to a specific instance from Azure. In this case, when we multiple instance in the backend, we will know that requests from the same client will end up on the same instance.

The bind between client and instance is formed by two types of tuples:
  • Client IP, Destination IP
  • Client IP, Destination IP, Protocol
Type of instances supported
In this moment there 3 types of instances that are support
  • Web Roles
  • Worker Roles
  • Virtual Machines 
, and load balancer endpoints.

How to configure
The configuration is very similar for all types of instances. We need to set the load balancer distribution to 'sourceIP'. 
Web/Worker Roles
This can be done from the .csdef file, in the moment when we configure the input endpoint. See below example:
<WorkerRole name="foo" vmsize="small" enableNativeCodeExecution="false">
  <Endpoints>
    <InputEndpoint ... loadBalancerDistribution="sourceIP" />
  </Endpoints>
</WorkerRole>
Load Balancer Endpoint
This can be done using Power Shell, by setting the LoadBalancerDistribution attribute to 'sourceIP'

What we should be aware when using default Azure Load Balancer configuration
By default, Azure Load Balancer is using a tuple formed from 5 elements

  • (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port, protocol type)
This means that we have a stick connection already, but the source port and destination port are used also to identify the instance. If we have multiple requests, with different port source or destination ports and we want to keep them on the same instance, that we should use Source IP Affinity.

In conclusion we should keep in mind what kind of sticky connection we need and what part of a request will define our sticky connection (IP, ports, protocol).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see